LSPL draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Replaced content with "The LibreSilicon Public License, LSPL for short, should: # be based on the AGPL # cover software, HDL code, schematics, layouts and netlists # allow dynamic linking of lib...") Tags: Replaced Manual revert |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The LibreSilicon Public License, LSPL for short, | The LibreSilicon Public License, LSPL for short, should: | ||
# be based on the AGPL | # be based on the AGPL | ||
# cover software, HDL code, schematics, layouts and netlists | # cover software, HDL code, schematics, layouts and netlists | ||
# allow dynamic linking of libraries in closed-source projects, like in the LGPL | # allow dynamic linking of libraries in closed-source projects, like in the LGPL | ||
# extend the dynamic linking policy from the LGPL to IP-cores licensed under the LSPL | # extend the dynamic linking policy from the LGPL to IP-cores licensed under the LSPL | ||
# make use of the legal protection of topographies (layout designs) of semiconductor products | |||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 29 January 2023
The LibreSilicon Public License, LSPL for short, should:
- be based on the AGPL
- cover software, HDL code, schematics, layouts and netlists
- allow dynamic linking of libraries in closed-source projects, like in the LGPL
- extend the dynamic linking policy from the LGPL to IP-cores licensed under the LSPL
- make use of the legal protection of topographies (layout designs) of semiconductor products